A tactical guide for GPs, LPs, and founders
In VC, metrics aren’t just dashboards—they’re decision tools.
Whether you're raising your next fund, pitching LPs, or evaluating a founder’s pitch deck, the right metrics—used in the right context—can shape outcomes. The wrong ones? They can mislead, inflate, or obscure the real story.
This isn’t a glossary. It’s a tactical breakdown of the key metrics across funds, startups, and firms—what they mean, when to use them, and how to interpret them without getting played.
If you’re managing a VC fund, your real customer is the LP. And LPs read numbers like term sheets—they look past the headline and go straight to the terms behind the terms.
What it is: Overall value—realized and unrealized—per dollar invested
When to use: Mid to late fund life
Good looks like: 2.0×+ is strong
LP interpretation: High TVPI with low DPI = paper gains. High TVPI with high DPI = real gains.
⚠️ Red flag: 2.5× TVPI + 0.2× DPI = might be sitting on inflated marks.
What it is: Actual cash returned to LPs
When to use: Mid to late fund life
Good looks like: 1.0× = breakeven; 1.5×+ = solid
LP interpretation: Real money talks. Low DPI = no liquidity. High DPI = you’ve delivered.
⚠️ Red flag: Early DPI spikes may signal premature exits to boost optics.
What it is: Unrealized value still held in the fund
When to use: Early to mid fund life
Good looks like: 0.8–1.2× (early), <0.3× (late)
LP interpretation: Signals potential upside—but is it real, or just markup theatre?
⚠️ Red flag: High RVPI in late years = stalled exits or overvaluation.
What it is: Time-adjusted annual return
When to use: All stages, especially mid-late
Good looks like: 20%+ net = top quartile
LP interpretation: Measures velocity, not just volume.
⚠️ Red flag: High IRR + low DPI = could be front-loaded optics.
What it is: Gross return multiple, pre-fees
When to use: Deal-level or fund lens
Good looks like: 2.5–3.5× (fund); 5×+ (deals)
LP interpretation: Simplifies money in/money out—no time weighting.
⚠️ Red flag: 3× MOIC over 15 years = 7% IRR. Not that impressive.
Great decks don’t just tell stories—they prove them. These are the numbers that shape conviction when VCs decide to write a check.
What it shows: Predictable revenue
VC lens: ARR at Series A? Look for $1M+ and 2–3× YoY growth
Context that wins: Pair ARR with growth rate and churn. Flat ARR is a red flag, even if the top-line looks good.
What they show: Growth efficiency
Pro tip: Show CAC split by channel (paid vs. organic). Investors want scalable economics.
What it shows: Capital retention after COGS
What it shows: Product-market fit
What they show: Capital efficiency
⚠️ Red flag: High burn + low growth = runway risk.
What it shows: Customer advocacy
Behind every top-performing fund is an engine that runs well. These metrics won’t show up in LP reports, but they determine whether your firm actually scales.
Track: Avg. time from first meeting → signed term sheet
Why it matters: Speed = competitive edge. Don’t lose great founders to slow process.
Great metrics don’t raise capital. Great context does. Every chart has a backstory. The best GPs and founders know how to tell it—clearly, confidently, and honestly.